Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A database of 26 previous full-scale experiments on rectangular hollow section (RHS) trusses is supplemented by nine tests on a 10-metre-span, simply supported, RHS Warren truss, reported herein. Measured axial forces, bending moments and truss deflections are compared to four 2D, elastic, frame-analysis models consisting of: (i) all joints pinned and concentric; (ii) all joints rigid and concentric; (iii) pin-ended webs connected eccentrically to continuous chords; and (iv) rigid-ended webs connected eccentrically to continuous chords. On average, all four models predict sufficiently accurate axial force distributions and deflections under elastic loading. However, all four models under-predict bending moment magnitudes. Implications for RHS truss analysis according to the “detailed method” of CSA S16-14 are discussed, and recommendations for modelling are made.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it