Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The mean shift (MS) algorithm is an iterative method introduced for locating modes of a probability density function. Although the MS algorithm has been widely used in many applications, the convergence of the algorithm has not yet been proven. In this study, the authors modify the MS algorithm in order to guarantee its convergence. The authors prove that the generated sequence using the proposed modified algorithm is a convergent sequence and the density estimate values along the generated sequence are monotonically increasing and convergent. In contrast to the MS algorithm, the proposed modified version does not require setting a stopping criterion a priori; instead, it guarantees the convergence after a finite number of iterations. The proposed modified version defines an upper bound for the number of iterations which is missing in the MS algorithm. The authors also present the matrix form of the proposed algorithm and show that, in contrast to the MS algorithm, the weight matrix is required to be computed once in the first iteration. The performance of the proposed modified version is compared with the MS algorithm and it was shown through the simulations that the proposed version can be used successfully to estimate cluster centres.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it