Le droit public et l’interface politico-administrative : le contrôle de l’abus de pouvoir
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article vise à préciser la façon dont le droit public analyse ce que la science politique perçoit comme les rapports d’interface entre le politique et l’administratif. Le droit s’attarde surtout aux pouvoirs, toujours accordés par la loi, et aux processus dans lesquels ils s’inscrivent. Le pouvoir n’est pas le propre de la sphère politique, puisque la sphère administrative dispose aussi de pouvoirs. Les pouvoirs sont discrétionnaires ou liés, selon la marge de manœuvre accordée à son titulaire. Les pouvoirs discrétionnaires de l’appareil public ne doivent jamais être exercés de façon arbitraire, et c’est donc par le concept de l’abus de pouvoir que les tribunaux peuvent exercer un contrôle judiciaire des ingérences illégitimes dans l’exercice d’un pouvoir.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.015 | 0.012 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".