Dissociative Experiences, childhood trauma and alexithymia among mothers of children with autism spectrum disorder
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Dissociative Experiences, childhood trauma and alexithymia among mothers of children with autism spectrum disorder Objective: Previous studies have consistently pointed out that parents of children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) had worse mental health relative to parents of normally developing children. In this study, it was aimed to investigate differences in dissociative experiences, childhood trauma and alexithymia between mothers of children with and without ASD. Methods: Thirty-one mothers whose children had a principal diagnosis of ASD and thirty mothers whose had any current psychiatric diagnosis or a history of psychiatric disorder included in the study. The Dissociative Experiences Scale (DES), Toronto Alexithymia Scale (TAS-20), Childhood Trauma Scale (CTQ-28) and Somatoform Dissociation Scale (SDQ) were used as data collection tools. Results: In our study, mothers of children with ASD had more severe dissociative symptomatology, greater depersonalization / derealization, more frequent childhood sexual abuse and physical neglect compared to mothers in control group. However, there was no significant difference in alexithymia levels between two groups. Discussion: The results of our study showed that dissociative symptomatology and childhood traumas should be considered among mothers of children with ASD.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it