MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Transparencia y acceso a la información judicial

2003· article· es· W28872989 on OpenAlexaff
Juan Luis González Alcántara

Bibliographic record

VenueReforma Judicial Revista Mexicana de Justicia · 2003
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicLegal processes and jurisprudence
Canadian institutionsImpact
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Deseo expresar mi más cumplido agradecimiento a los organizadores de este encuentro de juristas, por la oportunidad que me brindan para participar en este foro, cuya finalidad es el intercambio de opiniones sobre un tema que es a la par actual y trascendente, y que impacta no solamente a la ciencia del derecho, sino a la estructura básica del Estado mexicano y a su vocación republicana y democrática; es aquí donde se inserta, a mi juicio, la regulación de la transparencia y acceso a la información en su aspecto judicial.Potestad del derecho es hacer realidad la justicia y para alcanzarla requiere necesariamente de una sociedad ordenada, donde impere la paz.La afortunada frase de Francesco Carnelutti: ''Cuando el derecho nace, muere la guerra'', conceptúa brevemente la función ordenadora de la norma jurídica.En una sociedad abierta al caos, la concordia de sus miembros naufraga y afloran el roce de pasiones e intereses, propiciando la lucha y la negación misma del Estado de derecho.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.011
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.027
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.021
Threshold uncertainty score0.061

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0110.027
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0040.006
Scholarly communication0.0110.007
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0040.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.332
Teacher spread0.317 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueReforma Judicial Revista Mexicana de JusticiaSame topicLegal processes and jurisprudenceFrench-language works237,207