THE CONSISTENCY OF LEGAL ANALYSIS FOR DOCUMENT PLANNING AND IMPLEMENTATION OF RURAL FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT BASED ON WORK PROGRAM IN REGENT OF NORTH BOLAANG MONGONDOW.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In Law Number 6 of 2014 article 81 paragraph (1) it is explained that the Village Development is carried out in accordance with the Village Government Work Plan.From the explanation of those articles shows that, development done in the Village must be done in accordance with the planning that has been in the previous arrangement, it is intended that development planning and implementation are integrated.The preparation of this work plan helps the village government in the implementation stage of the activity, so that the activities carried out can provide benefits for the village community.In the village development planning process, the village government should prepare three (3) planning documents namely the Village Mid Term Development Plan, the Village Government Work Plan, and the Village Revenue and Expenditure Budget.In accordance with the data that researchers have obtained several villages in Bolaang Mongondow North District in making the development planning documents of the village always reap various technical problems.So that impact on the process of realization of the implementation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.018 | 0.033 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".