MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2887347805 · doi:10.3968/10313

Transformation of Civilization and the Construction of China’s Grand Strategy

2018· article· en· W2887347805 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Wenmiao Yang

Bibliographic record

VenueCross-cultural communication · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicWorld Systems and Global Transformations
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCivilizationChinaPoliticsEnvironmental ethicsPolitical scienceEcological civilizationSociologySocial sciencePolitical economyEconomic systemLawEconomicsPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

At present, mankind is in an age of civilized transformation, which is from industrial civilization to post-industrial civilization, or ecological civilization and sustainable civilization. In the course of 40 years of reform and opening up, China’s understanding and pursuit of civilization has undergone major changes, from a purely material and class struggle demand to a five-pronged view of civilization, which includes material civilization, spiritual civilization, political civilization, social civilization, and ecological civilization. Building China’s grand strategy in the process of civilized transformation requires us to proceed from the direction of the five civilizations, and take corresponding measures in the fields of economic globalization and regional integration, rejuvenation of science and technology, cultural values, a harmonious world, political transformation, international mechanisms, ecological civilization, and global issues.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.040
Threshold uncertainty score0.079

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0050.010
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0000.003
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.343
Teacher spread0.318 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCross-cultural communicationSame topicWorld Systems and Global TransformationsFrench-language works237,207