MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2887386175 · doi:10.1103/physrevc.98.024603

Structure of <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mmultiscripts><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Be</mml:mi><mml:mprescripts/><mml:none/><mml:mn>13</mml:mn></mml:mmultiscripts></mml:math> studied in proton knockout from <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mmultiscripts><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">B</mml:mi><mml:mprescripts/><mml:none/><mml:mn>14</mml:mn></mml:mmultiscripts></mml:math>

2018· article· lv· W2887386175 on OpenAlexaff
G. Ribeiro, E. Nácher, O. Tengblad, P. Díaz Fernández, Y. Aksyutina, H. Álvarez-Pol, L. Atar, T. Aumann, V.V. Avdeichikov, S. Beceiro-Novo, D. Bemmerer, J. Benlliure, C. A. Bertulani, J. M. Boillos, K. Boretzky, M. J. G. Borge, M. Caamaño, C. Caesar, E. Casarejos, W. N. Catford, J. Cederkäll, M. Chartier, L.V. Chulkov, D. Cortina‐Gil, E. Cravo, R. Crespo, U. Datta Pramanik, I. Dillmann, Z. Elekes, J. Enders, O. Ershova, A. Estradé, F. Farinon, L. M. Fraile, M. Freer, H. O. U. Fynbo, D. Galaviz, H. Geißel, R. Gernhäuser, P. Golubev, K. Göbel, J. Hagdahl, T. Heftrich, M. Heil, M. Heine, A. Heinz, Ana Margarida Henriques, M. Holl, Alexander G. Hufnagel, A. Ignatov, H. Johansson, B. Jonson, N. Kalantar‐Nayestanaki, R. Kanungo, A. Kelić-Heil, N. Kurz, T. Kröll, M. Labiche, C. Langer, T. Le Bleis, R. C. Lemmon, S. Lindberg, Jorge Machado, J. Marganiec, A. Movsesyan, T. Nilsson, C. Nociforo, V. Panin, S. Paschalis, Á. Perea, M. Petri, S. Piétri, R. Plag, R. Reifarth, C. Rigollet, K. Riisager, D. Rossi, M. Röder, D. Savran, H. Scheit, H. Simon, O. Sorlin, I. Syndikus, J. T. Taylor, R. Thies, Paulo Eduardo Neves Ferreira Velho, A. Wagner, F. Wamers, M. Vandebrouck, H. Weick, C. Wheldon, G. L. Wilson, K. Wimmer, J. S. Winfield, P. J. Woods, M. V. Zhukov, A. Zilges, Κ. Zuber

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical review. C · 2018
Typearticle
Languagelv
FieldMedicine
TopicRadiation Therapy and Dosimetry
Canadian institutionsSaint Mary's University
FundersRIKENHelmholtz International Center for FAIREmberi Eroforrások MinisztériumaU.S. Department of EnergyEuropean CommissionTechnische Universität DarmstadtMinisterio de Ciencia e InnovaciónBundesministerium für Bildung und ForschungSeventh Framework ProgrammeScience and Technology Facilities CouncilDeutsche ForschungsgemeinschaftMinisterio de Economía y CompetitividadNational Science Foundation
KeywordsComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The neutron-unbound isotope $^{13}\mathrm{Be}$ has been studied in several experiments using different reactions, different projectile energies, and different experimental setups. There is, however, no real consensus in the interpretation of the data, in particular concerning the structure of the low-lying excited states. Gathering new experimental information, which may reveal the $^{13}\mathrm{Be}$ structure, is a challenge, particularly in light of its bridging role between $^{12}\mathrm{Be}$, where the $N=8$ neutron shell breaks down, and the Borromean halo nucleus $^{14}\mathrm{Be}$. The purpose of the present study is to investigate the role of bound excited states in the reaction product $^{12}\mathrm{Be}$ after proton knockout from $^{14}\mathrm{B}$, by measuring coincidences between $^{12}\mathrm{Be}$, neutrons, and $\ensuremath{\gamma}$ rays originating from de-excitation of states fed by neutron decay of $^{13}\mathrm{Be}$. The $^{13}\mathrm{Be}$ isotopes were produced in proton knockout from a 400 MeV/nucleon $^{14}\mathrm{B}$ beam impinging on a ${\mathrm{CH}}_{2}$ target. The $^{12}\mathrm{Be}\text{\ensuremath{-}}n$ relative-energy spectrum $d\ensuremath{\sigma}/d{E}_{fn}$ was obtained from coincidences between $^{12}\mathrm{Be}$(g.s.) and a neutron, and also as threefold coincidences by adding $\ensuremath{\gamma}$ rays, from the de-excitation of excited states in $^{12}\mathrm{Be}$. Neutron decay from the first $5/{2}^{+}$ state in $^{13}\mathrm{Be}$ to the ${2}^{+}$ state in $^{12}\mathrm{Be}$ at 2.11 MeV is confirmed. An energy independence of the proton-knockout mechanism is found from a comparison with data taken with a 35 MeV/nucleon $^{14}\mathrm{B}$ beam. A low-lying $p$-wave resonance in $^{13}\mathrm{Be}(1/{2}^{\ensuremath{-}})$ is confirmed by comparing proton- and neutron-knockout data from $^{14}\mathrm{B}$ and $^{14}\mathrm{Be}$.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.621
Threshold uncertainty score0.540

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0040.003
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0030.005
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0060.005
Open science0.0050.003
Research integrity0.0040.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.6210.629

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.275
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical review. CSame topicRadiation Therapy and DosimetryFrench-language works237,207