A new aneuretine ant from the Paleocene Paskapoo Formation of Canada
Bibliographic record
Abstract
While ants were present in the Cretaceous they were relatively rare.This changes dramatically from the Eocene onward when ants rise to the levels of global dominance seen in terrestrial ecosystems today.Their prevalence is well documented in various Eocene, Oligocene, and Miocene fossil deposits, but there is a conspicuous absence of ant-bearing fossil deposits around the Cretaceous-Paleogene boundary.In particular, until this study, there were no definitive ant-yielding deposits between 78 million and 55 million years ago, a 23-million-year gap.This gap is significant because, in addition to spanning a time when ant prevalence increases by an order of magnitude, the fossil rich deposits from the Eocene onward reveal a dramatically different ant fauna from that observed in the Mesozoic.The Paleocene Paskapoo Formation in Alberta, Canada has yielded a variety of fossil arthropod specimens, including a single worker ant fossil.Examination of this fossil indicates it is a species belonging to the now monotypic and relictual ant subfamily Aneuretinae.Napakimyrma paskapooensis gen et.sp.nov. is here described, revealing a species exhibiting a number of interesting and unique morphological features.Its placement as an aneuretine is supported by the presence of a long anterior peduncle of the petiole.A total of 11 fossil aneuretine taxa are now known, but for several, their placement within the subfamily is highly uncertain and needs further study.A discussion of all fossil aneuretine taxa is provided.Given the uncertainty of the apomorphies defining the Aneuretinae, and the fact that fossil species suggest a greater historic morphological diversity for the subfamily than is present now in the single, living species, it is important to consider the need for flexibility in defining synapomorphies for Aneuretinae and any such analysis will need to involve reevaluation of the fossil fauna.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".