Aportes a la teoría de la CCO desde la perspectiva de la comunicación integral
Bibliographic record
Abstract
espanolEl ensayo presenta una sintesis de los principales postulados de las tres escuelas de pensamiento organizacional conocida como la Teoria de la Constitucion Comunicativa de las Organizaciones (CCO), propuesta de vanguardia que ha tomado fuerza a partir de tres nucleos o grupos de investigadores mejor conocidos como la Escuela de Montreal, la Escuela de los Cuatros Flujos de Comunicacion y la Escuela de los Sistemas Sociales. El trabajo realiza comentarios criticos en torno a la concepcion misma del Lenguaje en la Escuela de Montreal, de los agentes no humanos en las aportaciones de la perspectiva de los Sistemas Sociales, y la concepcion misma de la comunicacion en las tres. Se subraya la riqueza de la aportacion sobre la relacion entre organizacion y comunicacion que hacen estas teorias. El argumento central de la ponencia es que si bien es posible destacar a la CCO como una aportacion novedosa sobre la naturaleza de las organizaciones y sus interacciones con la comunicacion, entonces hay factores, que siendo componentes necesarios para la creacion y mantenimiento de las organizaciones, esta perspectiva de la CCO no las toma en cuenta tales como: factores externos como los juridicos, culturales, el poder con los cuales se da origen a la organizacion; factores internos como el capital economico, el capital humano y los componentes tecnologicos. Concluye el trabajo senalando algunas directrices para tomar los planteamientos de la CCO desde la propuesta de la comunicacion integral para las organizaciones (CIO). Ello senala el camino hacia mayores esfuerzos de investigacion requeridos para robustecer a la misma CCO. EnglishThe essay presents a synthesis of the main postulates of the three schools of organizational thinking known as the Theory of the Communicative Constitution of Organizations (CCO), a vanguard proposal that has drawn strength from three nuclei or groups of researchers better known as the School of Montreal, the School of Four Communication Flows and the School of Social Systems. The work makes critical comments about the very conception of Language in the School of Montreal, non-human agents in the contributions of the perspective of Social Systems, and the very conception of communication in the three. It emphasizes the richness of the contribution on the relationship between organization and communication that these theories make. The central argument of the paper is that while it is possible to highlight the CCO as a novel contribution to the nature of organizations and their interactions with communication, then there are factors that are necessary components for the creation and maintenance of organizations, this perspective of the CCO does not take into account such as: external factors such as legal, cultural, the power with which the organization originates; internal factors such as economic capital, human capital and technological components. He concludes the paper by pointing out some guidelines for taking the CCO's proposals from the proposal of the Comprehensive Communication for Organizations (CIO). This points the way towards greater research efforts required to strengthen the CCO itself. portuguesO ensaio apresenta uma sintese dos principais postulados das tres escolas de pensamento organizacional conhecidas como a Teoria da Constituicao Comunicativa das Organizacoes (CCO), uma proposta de vanguarda que extraiu forca de tres nucleos ou grupos de pesquisadores mais conhecidos como Escola de Montreal, a Escola dos Quatro Fluxos de Comunicacao e a Escola de Sistemas Sociais. O trabalho faz comentarios criticos sobre a propria concepcao de Linguagem na Escola de Montreal, agentes nao humanos nas contribuicoes da perspectiva dos Sistemas Sociais, e a propria concepcao de comunicacao nos tres. Ele enfatiza a riqueza da contribuicao sobre a relacao entre organizacao e comunicacao que essas teorias fazem. O argumento central do artigo e que, embora seja possivel destacar o CCO como uma nova contribuicao para a natureza das organizacoes e suas interacoes com a comunicacao, existem fatores que sao componentes necessarios para a criacao e manutencao das organizacoes, essa perspectiva de o CCO nao leva em conta fatores externos como legais, culturais, o poder com o qual a organizacao se origina; fatores internos como capital economico, capital humano e componentes tecnologicos. Ele conclui o artigo apontando algumas diretrizes para tirar as propostas do CCO da proposta da Comunicacao Abrangente para Organizacoes (CIO). Isso aponta o caminho para maiores esforcos de pesquisa necessarios para fortalecer o proprio CCO.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.007 | 0.009 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.010 | 0.027 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.018 | 0.009 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.010 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.018 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".