MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2887447252 · doi:10.1158/1538-7445.am2018-1203

Abstract 1203: Incidence of AJCC7 stage III or regionally advanced cutaneous melanoma in the United States

2018· article· en· W2887447252 on OpenAlexaff
Ahmad M. Tarhini, Sameer R. Ghate, Antônio Nakasato, Raluca Ionescu‐Ittu, Sherry Shi, Briana Ndife, Rebecca Burne, François Laliberté, Mei Sheng Duh

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management
Canadian institutionsGroup for Research in Decision Analysis
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMelanomaMedicineIncidence (geometry)PopulationStage (stratigraphy)Cancer registryEpidemiologyCancerInternal medicineOncologyCancer research

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background: Incidence of stage III/regional melanoma by patient characteristics can help estimate the number of high-risk patients (pts) potentially eligible for adjuvant treatment in a rapidly evolving field and guide the design of future clinical trials based on real-world data. The study describes the incidence of AJCC7 stage III/regional melanoma in the US (a) over time and (b) by melanoma prognostic factors. Methods: Pts newly diagnosed with invasive melanoma were identified in the US Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) cancer registry (years 2010 -2014; n = 106,195). Stage III melanoma was defined based on the AJCC7 classification (n = 7,669); pts classified as AJCC7 stages I/II but with reported evidence of lymphatic metastasis were considered regionally advanced and included (n =169). Annual incidence was defined as the proportion of individuals in the general population who developed stage III/regionally advanced melanoma over a one-year period (the denominator included the full or age/sex-specific population, as appropriate). Results: During the study period, 7,838 (7.4%) pts were diagnosed with stage III/regional melanoma . The incidence of invasive melanoma has increased from year 2010 to year 2014: from 14.16 to 16.15/100,000 for stages I-IV combined and from 1.25 to 1.50/100,000 for stage III/regional melanoma. Based on the 2014 incidence and the most recent age-specific census population data, it is estimated that 5,109 pts were newly diagnosed in year 2016 with stage III/regional melanoma. In 2014, the incidence of stage III/regional melanoma was higher in elderly than adults and children (incidence per 100,000: 5.16 vs 1.33 and 0.08, respectively) and in males than females (1.79 vs 1.23). Table 1 presents incidence estimates by melanoma characteristics. Conclusions: The results of this analysis indicate an increase in stage III/regional melanoma incidence from 2010 to 2014 and a high incidence of stage III melanoma with poor prognostic factors. Table 1.Stage III1/regional melanomaIncidence in year 20142 (estimate of newly diagnosed in the US in 20163) By tumor thickness4≤ 0.8 mm0.12/ 100,000 population (n=393)0.81 - 1mm0.04 / 100,000 population (n=143)1.01 - 2 mm0.31/ 100,000 population (n=1,028)2.01 - 4 mm0.29/ 100,000 population (n=990)> 4 mm0.37/ 100,000 population (n=1,270)By ulcerationYes0.54/ 100,000 population (n=1,858)No0.62/ 100,000 population (n=2,099)Unknown0.34/ 100,000 population (n=1,152)By number mitoses per square mmNone0.05/ 100,000 population (n=174)1 - 50.58/ 100,000 population (n=1,961)6 - 100.20/ 100,000 population (n=672)≥ 110.17/ 100,000 population (n=588)Unknown0.50/ 100,000 population (n=1,713)Any LN involvement1.40/ 100,000 population (n=4,725)1 LN0.78 / 100,000 population (n=2,622)2 - 3 LNs0.34 / 100,000 population (n=1,155)> 3 LNs0.16/ 100,000 population (n=531)Unknown number of LNs0.12/ 100,000 population (n=416)Microscopic nodal metastasis5 (regardless of the number of LNs)0.81/ 100,000 population (n=2,725)Satellite / in-transit without LN involvement 0.09/100,000 population (n=311)LN, lymph node; [1] Defined using the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) 7 edition classification. [2] New cases diagnosed in 2014 (most recent year available in SEER) / 100,000 population; based on mid-year general population in 2014 for the geographical areas covered by the SEER (118,955,244 individuals). [3] Based on age-specific incidence and most recent population estimates (year 2016) from the US Census Bureau (age < 21 years = 86,391,289; age 21- 64 years = 187,492,029; age > 64 years = 49,244,195). [4] "Unknown" not shown if incidence <0.05 /100,000 population. [5] Includes pts identified with clinically occult (microscopic) LN metastases only, pts with isolated tumor cells only in LN, and/or pts who underwent sentinel LN biopsy and were found to have LN metastasis. Citation Format: Ahmad M. Tarhini, Sameer R. Ghate, Antonio Nakasato, Raluca Ionescu-Ittu, Sherry Shi, Briana Ndife, Rebecca Burne, François Laliberté, Mei Sheng Duh. Incidence of AJCC7 stage III or regionally advanced cutaneous melanoma in the United States [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2018; 2018 Apr 14-18; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 1203.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.023
Threshold uncertainty score0.046

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.079
GPT teacher head0.408
Teacher spread0.329 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer ResearchSame topicCutaneous Melanoma Detection and ManagementFrench-language works237,207