ACREDITAÇÃO HOSPITALAR: A EXCELÊNCIA COMO FONTE DE SOFRIMENTO MORAL PARA ENFERMEIROS
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objetivo: Analisar a prática profissional de enfermeiros em um hospital privado acreditado, sob o prisma da ética da virtude. Metodologia: Estudo de caso qualitativo, realizado em um Hospital Privado “Acreditado com Excelência” em Minas Gerais. Os participantes foram 13 enfermeiros. A coleta de dados foi realizada mediante entrevista individual seguindo roteiro semiestruturado e observação e submetidos à Análise Temática de Conteúdo. Resultados: Foram identificadas contradições entre os valores que norteiam a organização do trabalho na instituição, cujo enfoque é a acreditação e os valores dos enfermeiros, os quais são voltados para o cuidado. Conclusão: A contradição encontrada distancia o enfermeiro de sua prática, colocando-o em confronto com a sua profissão, provocando sofrimento moral.Descritores: Enfermagem, Dano Moral, Ética em Enfermagem, Acreditação Hospitalar, Prática Privada de Enfermagem.HOSPITAL ACCREDITATION: EXCELLENCE AS A SOURCE OF MORAL DISTRESS FOR NURSESObjective: To analyze the professional practice of nurses in an accredited private hospital, under the prism of virtue ethics. Methodology: Case study with a qualitative approach performed in a Private Hospital “Excelent in Accreditation” in Minas Gerais. The participants were 13 nurses. The data collection was performed through an individual interview following a semistructured script and observation and, submitted to the Thematic Content Analysis. Results: Contradictions were identified among the values that guide the organization of work in the institution, whose enforcement is the accreditation and values of nurses, which are focused on care. Conclusion: The contradiction found distances the nurses from their practice, putting them in confrontation with their profession, provoking the moral suffering.Descriptors: Nursing, Moral Development, Ethics Nursing, Accreditation, Nursing Private Duty.ACREDITACIÓN HOSPITALARIA: LA EXCELENCIA COMO FUENTE DE SUFRIMIENTO MORAL PARA ENFERMEIROSObjetivo: Analizar la práctica profesional de enfermeros en un hospital privado acreditado, bajo el prisma de la ética de la virtud. Metodología: Estudio de caso cualitativo realizado en un Hospital Privado “Acreditado con Excelencia” en Minas Gerais. Participaron del estudio 13 enfermeros. La recolección de datos fue realizada mediante entrevista individual siguiendo itinerario semiestructurado y observación y sometidos al Análisis Temático de Contenido. Resultados: Se identificaron contradicciones entre los valores que orientan la organización del trabajo en la institución, cuyo ahorque es la acreditación y los valores de los enfermeros, los cuales se dirigen al cuidado. Conclusión: La contradicción encontró distancia al enfermero de su práctica, colocándolo en confrontación con su profesion, provocando el sufrimiento moral.Descriptores: Enfermería, Daño Moral, Ética en Enfermería, Acreditación de Hospitales, Práctica Privada de Enfermería.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.007 | 0.021 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".