MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2887514393 · doi:10.22365/jpsych.2018.292.107

A proposal for the implementation of Early Intervention in Psychosis (EIP) services in Greece: If not now, when?

2018· article· en· W2887514393 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Nikos C. Stefanis, Venetsanos Mavreas, Ioannis Nimatoudis, F. Gourzis, Μ. Sarakouri, Alexandros N. Vgontzas, Athanasios Douzenis

Bibliographic record

VenuePsychiatriki · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicMental Health Treatment and Access
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPsychosisIntervention (counseling)Early psychosisPsychologyPsychiatryComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The disorders of the psychosis spectrum, with the most severe being schizophrenia, are prevalent and have a great impact on the patients' quality of life. The purpose of this article is to highlight the need for a novel national strategic approach to the management of psychotic disorders in accordance with the international principles of early intervention. Even though outpatient treatment is considered adequate, there is an urgent need to adopt an early and more comprehensive and effective intervention strategy for young patients with psychosis and their families whose clinical and personal needs are clearly not met by the existing infrastructure of our mental health services. This can be accomplished by the legislation and implementation within the national health system of EIP services which on the one hand actively engage community organizations with the purpose of early identification of cases, reduction of the duration of untreated psychosis and on the other, offer assertive community-based support and treatment, based on a multi-disciplinary community team model. The effectiveness of early intervention in psychosis is supported by evidence provided by 9 international RCTs. The results of these programs indicate a superior effect in indexes of quality of life, retention in treatment, psychopathology, judicious use of medication and return to work/school as well as the patient's effective recovery. International experience (Denmark, Norway, Australia, UK, USA, Canada and Italy) and the corresponding prevention programs emphasize the effectiveness of EIP services and thus the patients' reintegration. However, in contrast to Northern European countries, Southern European countries have not yet incorporated EIP services in their national health system. From a financial perspective, EIP services seem to be cost-effective for the national health system, since the economic burden is compensated in the long term through their qualitative benefits. In Greece, specialized services for those young afflicted for the first time by the most serious of mental disorders are non-existent and no local information exists for the patient's outcome and social integration after a first psychotic-episode nor for the financial burden, placed on mental health services. Overall, the implementation of EIP services is expected to have long-term benefits for our country's National Health System as well as for the patients and their families.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.020
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.021
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.023
Threshold uncertainty score0.106

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0200.021
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.003
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.005
Scholarly communication0.0060.005
Open science0.0040.008
Research integrity0.0230.009
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.413
Teacher spread0.387 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePsychiatrikiSame topicMental Health Treatment and AccessFrench-language works237,207