Wireless-Powered Full-Duplex Relay and Friendly Jamming for Secure Cooperative Communications
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Wireless energy harvesting, physical-layer security, and full-duplex wireless are important, emerging fifth generation (5G) technologies. In this paper, we thus investigate a source-destination link with an energy-harvesting full-duplex relay and a jammer (to degrade the eavesdropper channel) in the presence of an eavesdropper. Thus, to exploit energy harvesting and to improve security, we propose a full-duplex jammer (FDJ) protocol and its half-duplex version (HDJ). Two cases for availability of the eavesdropper channel state information (ECSI) are considered: complete ECSI and incomplete ECSI. For both FDJ and HDJ protocols and for complete ECSI, we derive the instantaneous and average secrecy rates and compute optimal time split for energy harvesting. To gain more insights, we consider a practical interference-limited scenario and derive closed-form cumulative distribution function of the signal-to-interference plus noise ratio at the destination and eavesdropper nodes. Comparatively, we show that FDJ improves instantaneous secrecy rate over HDJ. However, the degree of improvement is highly dependent on time split for energy harvesting, amount of self-interference, the channel gains, and locations of the nodes. Our findings reveal that FDJ increases the average secrecy rate 150% over HDJ and 260% over HD relaying without jammer. For incomplete ECSI scenario, we derive asymptotic secrecy outage and show that FDJ performs better for small-to-medium values of source powers; otherwise, HDJ yields a higher gain.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it