RESSOURCES NUMÉRIQUES POUR L’ENSEIGNEMENT DE LA LITTÉRATURE DE JEUNESSE. PROMESSES DU TEMPS JADIS, REPRÉSENTATIONS ENSEIGNANTES ET ESSAI MANQUÉ DE TYPOLOGIE
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article s’inscrit dans le champ de la didactique de la littérature de jeunesse et observe la qualité des ressources numériques mises à la disposition du corps enseignant, en quête de matériau pour construire une séquence d’enseignement. Deux prises de données guident notre propos : un questionnaire qui met en lumière les représentations d’enseignants en formation relativement à leurs connaissances en littérature de jeunesse, à leurs compétences didactiques et à leur recours aux ressources numériques, puis une exploration des ressources numériques potentiellement utiles pour les enseignants, dont le processus, plus que le résultat, devient le second objet d’étude. Nous terminons par énoncer ce qui constituerait un site didactique, soutenant les pratiques enseignantes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.016 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.006 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.007 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.009 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.015 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".