Weighted extremal Kähler metrics and the Einstein–Maxwell geometry of projective bundles
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We study the existence of weighted extremal Kähler metrics in the sense of [4, 32] on the total space of an admissible projective bundle over a Hodge Kähler manifold of constant scalar curvature. Admissible projective bundles have been defined in [5], and they include the projective line bundles [29] and their blow-downs [31], thus providing a most general setting for extending the existence theory for extremal Kähler metrics pioneered by a seminal construction of Calabi [12]. We obtain a general existence result for weighted extremal metrics on admissible manifolds, which yields many new examples of conformally Kähler, Einstein–Maxwell metrics of complex dimension m > 2, thus extending the recent constructions of [30, 38] to higher dimensions. For each admissible Kähler class on an admissible projective bundle, we associate an explicit function of one variable and show that if it is positive on the interval (−1, 1), then there exists a weighted extremal Kähler metric in the given class, whereas if it is strictly negative somewhere in (−1, 1), there is no Kähler metrics of constant weighted scalar curvature in that class. We also relate the positivity of the function to a notion of weighted K-stability, thus establishing a Yau–Tian–Donaldson type correspondence for the existence of Kähler metrics of constant weighted scalar curvature in the rational admissible Kähler classes on an admissible projective bundle. Weighted extremal orthotoric metrics are examined in an appendix.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.013 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it