MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2887764676 · doi:10.22456/2236-3254.81899

O ATOR-TELA, FERRAMENTA DE DIÁLOGO E DE CRIAÇÃO

2018· article· pt· W2887764676 on OpenAlexaff
Ludovic Fouquet

Bibliographic record

VenueDOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) · 2018
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicCultural, Media, and Literary Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtHumanitiesAestheticsVisual arts

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

No campo da vídeo-cena, múltiplos são os suportes de recepção ou difusão da imagem e, desde a década de 1950, quando das famosas explorações de Josef Svoboda, a materialidade da tela conheceu distintos empregos. Este artigo aborda em especial a situação do corpo-tela, um corpo que recebe a imagem, um corpo-tela percebido como um corpo mediador. Adota-se, como objeto de análise, espetáculos ou performances de artistas europeus ou norte-americanos, bem como experiências pessoais realizadas em ateliês, nas quais pode-se perceber que a projeção sobre o corpo ou parte dele vem modificá-lo e perturbar a leitura realizada a seu respeito.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.023
Threshold uncertainty score0.076

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0080.014
Scholarly communication0.0150.009
Open science0.0010.008
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0230.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.395
GPT teacher head0.556
Teacher spread0.161 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)Same topicCultural, Media, and Literary StudiesFrench-language works237,207