Biological characteristics of autumn and spring runs of Caspiomyzon wagneri into the Shirood River, Iran
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Various biological characteristics were compared between autumn and spring runs of Caspiomyzon wagneri migrating into the Shirood River, in an attempt to determine whether these were reproductively isolated. Two spawning runs of the same lamprey species in a single river are apparently unique to the Shirood. The autumn sample collected between 21 October and 1 November 2009 comprised 15 adults and the spring sample collected between 22 March and 18 April 2009 comprised 38 adults. While spawning was not witnessed, the significantly shorter mean total length of at least 40 cm in both males and females, and the significantly higher gonadosomatic index in females of the autumn run versus the spring run suggest that the former is closer to spawning than the latter. If one assumes a single spawning population per year in the river, the report by Nazari and Abdoli (2010) of recently spent individuals of Caspian lamprey collected in the Shirood River during April, would therefore imply that the spawning period is remarkably protracted. In order to test this hypothesis, the spawning sites need to be searched for higher upstream over the entire year, particularly in areas where suitable spawning substrate of gravel and sand occurs
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".