MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2887805940 · doi:10.23919/acc.2018.8431211

Real-time Control of HCCI Engine Using Model Predictive Control

2018· article· en· W2887805940 on OpenAlexaff
Khashayar Ebrahimi, Charles Robert Koch

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemical Engineering
TopicAdvanced Combustion Engine Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsModel predictive controlControl (management)Homogeneous charge compression ignitionComputer scienceControl theory (sociology)CombustionArtificial intelligenceChemistryCombustion chamber

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Model Predictive Control (MPC) for combustion timing and load control of a single cylinder Homogeneous Charge Compression Ignition (HCCI) engine is designed and implemented. First, a nonlinear control oriented model is obtained based on a Detailed Physical Model (DPM) using model order reduction techniques. The model is then linearized around one operating point and combustion timing and output work prediction are experimentally validated. This linearized model is then used in MPC with Exhaust Valve Closing (EVC) timing and fueling rate as main actuators. Combustion timing is defined as the crank angle of fifty percent fuel mass fraction burned, and is calculated from cylinder pressure. The controller is verified in simulation using the DPM considering constraints on inputs and outputs. The controller is then directly implemented on a dSPACE MicroAutoBox for HCCI combustion timing and load control. For real-time implementation of the MPC, Laguerre functions are used to simplify the conventional MPC algorithm which reduces the computation time. The MPC tracks the desired load and combustion timing trajectories while considering constraints on the actuators and outputs in simulation and on the engine.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.893
Threshold uncertainty score0.697

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Combustion Engine TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207