MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2887824383 · doi:10.1177/1077800418788106

Methodology as a Pedagogy of Vulnerability: Doctoral Research With/in/From the Borderlands

2018· article· en· W2887824383 on OpenAlexaff
Dirk J. Rodricks

Bibliographic record

VenueQualitative Inquiry · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicQualitative Research Methods and Ethics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNormativeSociologyVulnerability (computing)TRACE (psycholinguistics)PedagogyInterruptEpistemologyEngineering ethicsLinguisticsComputer scienceEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this article, I trace the ways in which my doctoral thesis methodology became a “pedagogy of vulnerability.” Using two “stop moments,” I describe the emergent “openings” that not only helped shape and shift the direction of my research, but also allowed me to be shaped by it. In being willing to labor, risk, and learn in and through the methodological choices made and especially with/in/from the borderlands, I demonstrate how one might think, work through, and play with the many possibilities that could interrupt the normative ways of “doing” research.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.115
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.043
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesMetaresearch
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.096
Threshold uncertainty score0.979

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.1150.043
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.024
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.839
GPT teacher head0.731
Teacher spread0.108 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueQualitative InquirySame topicQualitative Research Methods and EthicsFrench-language works237,207