MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2887825275 · doi:10.1111/gequ.12078

Narrating Bodies into Existence: Negotiating the Necessity of Corporeality and Relationality for Subject Construction in Thomas Glavinic's novel <i>Lisa</i> (2011)

2018· article· en· W2887825275 on OpenAlex
Simone Pfleger

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe German Quarterly · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSpatial and Cultural Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSubject (documents)NormativeNarrativeIdentity (music)SociologyStorytellingEpistemologyCharacter (mathematics)NegotiationOntologyAestheticsPreconditionPhilosophyLiteratureArtSocial scienceComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This essay examines how Austrian author Thomas Glavinic's novel Lisa (2011) challenges the necessity of corporeal presence as a precondition for becoming a subject with a legible and stable identity. Focusing on protagonist Tom's storytelling and his descriptions of Lisa, the mysterious criminal who is haunting him, this essay argues for an ontology of fluidity as an analytical framework for interrogating the ways in which relationality enables character construction through narration. Taking the concept of ‘relationality’ as its point of departure, this analysis of Glavinic's novel emphasizes how the text critically questions the necessity of physical presence as a precondition for existence as a subject and critiques normative conceptions of what constitutes an accepted and acceptable social body.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.632
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.332
Teacher spread0.294 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it