MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Characterization of thin film optical properties by THz near-field imaging method

2019· article· en· W2887831810 on OpenAlexaff
F. Amirkhan

Bibliographic record

VenueEspace ÉTS (ETS) · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPhotonic and Optical Devices
Canadian institutionsInstitut National de la Recherche ScientifiqueÉcole de Technologie Supérieure
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTerahertz radiationCharacterization (materials science)Thin filmMaterials scienceLithium niobateOptoelectronicsOpticsResonatorSplit-ring resonatorElectric fieldMagnetic fieldNanotechnologyPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present a new method to characterize thin film electro-optic and magneto-optic materials. The method is based on resolving the electric and/or magnetic field distributions in the near-field region of a split ring resonator (SRR) designed for the terahertz (THz) frequency range. We experimentally validate our simulations by THz near-field imaging of SRRs directly patterned in contact with a thin-film lithium niobate crystal as a sensor. Furthermore, we analytically study the effect of the different applied electric field polarizations and calculate the sensitivity of the sensor via various polarizations of probe beam.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.534
Threshold uncertainty score0.449

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEspace ÉTS (ETS)Same topicPhotonic and Optical DevicesFrench-language works237,207