MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2887836574

New data for Arctic Terns (Sterna paradisaea) migration from White Sea (Onega Peninsula)

2017· article· en· W2887836574 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Andrey Volkov, Maarten J. J. E. Loonen, E. V. Volkova, D.A. Denisov

Bibliographic record

VenueUniversity of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicArctic and Russian Policy Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArcticSternaPeninsulaGeographyTernOceanographyCircumpolar starFisheryPhysical geographyGeologyArchaeologyBiology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Arctic Tern (Sterna paradisaea) has one of the longest migratory routes of any species. Based on ring recoveries during the 20th century, Arctic Terns migrate several thousand km. from their breeding area in the Arctic to their wintering area in the Antarctic. The exact migratory paths of Arctic Terns from East Greenland, Iceland, the Netherlands, Spitsbergen and Alaska were investigated from 2007–2012 through the use of geolocators. In 2014–2015 we used geolocators in the Russian Arctic for the first time in order to study the migratory routes of Arctic Terns from their colony on the Onega Peninsula in the White Sea (64°56′42″ N, 36°44′20″ E). In 2014, geolocators were deployed on 20 Arctic Terns, and in 2015 we retrieved data from 7 birds. After leaving the colony on the Onega Peninsula at the end of July — beginning of August, and before the start of the southward migration, the Arctic Terns were located in a large area of the North Atlantic from Iceland to Baffin Land (Canadian Arctic). In general, the tracks of Arctic Terns from the White Sea and from the Netherlands coincided: from the North Atlantic, birds flew along the coast of west Africa, then across the Indian Ocean reaching Australian waters before finally arriving in East Antarctica in the area of Wilkes Land. Staging areas with a duration from 4 to 38 days were located in the North Atlantic, waters of South Africa and the central part of the Indian Ocean. Off south-east Africa, a previously unknown staging area was discovered. The wintering areas of the White Sea Arctic Terns are located in the huge Antarctic region from 90° E to 10° E, mainly between the wintering areas of the Arctic Terns from the Netherlands (Wilkes Land) and from Greenland, Spitsbergen and Alaska (Weddell Sea). One White Sea Arctic Tern was recorded in the Weddell Sea. The migratory route from Antarctica to the breeding area passes through the central part of the Atlantic with staging in the North Atlantic. From 20th May, Arctic Terns arrived at their breeding colony on the Onega Peninsula. The duration of the southward migration (an average of 104 days) is comparable with the duration of wintering in Antarctic waters (an average of 128 days). However, the northward migration is much shorter (an average of 61 days) because of the more direct way via the Atlantic. The speed of the southward and northward migrations are comparable (an average of 432 km/day and 488 km/day). The total average distance traveled by the White Sea Arctic Terns during the non-breeding period is more than 84300 km. One bird flew a distance of more than 103600 km – the maximum known distance for an Arctic Tern migration during one year.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.579
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0040.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.004
Open science0.0030.002
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.083
GPT teacher head0.335
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUniversity of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology)Same topicArctic and Russian Policy StudiesFrench-language works237,207