Anthropological profile of children alpine skiers
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The aim of this study was to evaluate morphological and physiological characteristics in young alpine skiers. Study was conducted on selected sample of 26 boys, alpine skiers. They were members of Croatian alpine ski teams from Zagreb and Rijeka and on average were 11.9 years old (age span 9 to 13 years). All physiological and morphological assessments were conducted at the beginning of competitive season 2001/02. Alpine skiers have similar average heights as normal population of the same age in Croatia, as well as body mass. This results support the findings on senior alpine skiers who also do not differ from normal population. Body fat values for young alpine skiers were similar but slightly lower than those reported for older skiers and almost the same as little older junior skiers. These data suggest that a desirable body composition for elite skiers may be attained by early adolescence. Absolute and relative maximal oxygen uptake were significantly higher than average values for a normal population in Croatia of the same age group. In comparison with Canadian or American junior alpine skiers, as well as adult ski competitors Croatian skiers revealed significantly worse results.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".