MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2887852867 · doi:10.1158/1538-7445.am2018-760

Abstract 760: Conjugation of daratumumab with 225actinium greatly increases its antitumor activity against multiple myeloma tumors

2018· article· en· W2887852867 on OpenAlexaff
Wojciech Dawicki, Kevin J. Allen, Rubin Jiao, Mackenzie E. Malo, Keisha Thomas, Mark S. Berger, Ekaterina Dadachova

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRadiopharmaceutical Chemistry and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDaratumumabMedicineMultiple myelomaAntibodyCancer researchPharmacologyImmunologyInternal medicineBortezomib

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Daratumumab is a human cytolytic antibody specific for CD38 that is used clinically for treatment of patients with multiple myeloma (MM). Current therapeutic regimens require multiple injections over months of treatment. Increasing the potency of daratumumab to shorten the length of treatment would be beneficial. 225Ac is an alpha-particle emitting radionuclide that has potent cytotoxic activities over short distances, allowing for precise targeting of a lethal dose of radiation. Previously we have established that labeling daratumumab with 225Ac increased more than 10-fold its ability to kill MM cell lines in vitro (ASH 2017, Poster Number 4427). In this study we evaluated the ability of 225Ac-daratumumab to kill established tumors in mice. Mice deficient in T- and B-cells were injected subcutaneously with human MM tumor cells and once tumors reached an average volume of ~200 mm3, mice were treated with the 225Ac-daratumumab. To determine the localization of daratumumab within the tumor-bearing mice it was labeled with 111In, an γ-emitting radioisotope. 111In-daratumumab can be easily imaged and is used as a surrogate to estimate the localization of 225Ac-daratumumab. The distribution of the 111In-daratumumab was then followed for 10 days using a microSPECT/CT scanner. To evaluate the antitumor ability of the 225Ac-daratumumab, tumor-bearing mice were injected with 225Ac-daratumumab at a dose of of 400 nCi/0.3 μg of antibody, and 200 nCi/0.3 μg of antibody. As a control, mice were injected with either saline or an equivalent amount of unlabeled daratumumab. In addition, a group of mice was also treated with 30 times greater dose of unlabeled daratumumab (10 μg) - a dose which was previously shown to be effective against established tumors. 111In-daratumumab begun to accumulate in the tumor 24 hours after intraperitoneal injection and by 7 days was exclusively present in the tumor. The growth of the tumors in mice treated with 400 nCi/0.3 μg was significantly retarded compared to mice treated with equal concentration of unlabeled daratumumab or saline. Tumor growth was similar between mice treated with 400 nCi/0.3 μg of 225Ac-daratumumab and mice treated with 10 μg of unlabeled daratumumab. In conclusion, this study shows that labeling daratumumab with 225Ac increases its antitumor activity ~30-fold. This study suggests that approach to increase the potency of daratumumab via 225Ac labeling could greatly reduce the amount of daratumumab treatment needed in the clinic. This study also highlights the potential of targeting α-emitters to tumors as a viable therapeutic approach. Citation Format: Wojciech Dawicki, Kevin Allen, Rubin Jiao, Mackenzie Malo, Keisha Thomas, Mark S. Berger, Ekaterina Dadachova. Conjugation of daratumumab with 225actinium greatly increases its antitumor activity against multiple myeloma tumors [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2018; 2018 Apr 14-18; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 760.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.121
GPT teacher head0.443
Teacher spread0.322 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer ResearchSame topicRadiopharmaceutical Chemistry and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207