Les croyances pédagogiques et identitaires des enseignants de la formation professionnelle : le rôle de l’expérience d’enseignement et de la formation pédagogique
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Les croyances des enseignants sont liees aux pratiques d’enseignement et ainsi,indirectement, aux apprentissages des eleves, faisant d’elles un sujet important. Le but de cette etude etait de mettre en evidence l’effet de l’experience et de la formation pedagogique sur les croyances pedagogiques et identitaires des enseignants de la formation professionnelle en Suisse romande. Au total, 390 enseignants ont participe a l’etude en repondant a un questionnaire. Les analyses de variance conduites montrent que tant les annees d’experience que la formation pedagogique ainsi que leur interaction ont un effet sur l’adhesion aux croyances considerees. Les questions de l’immuabilite des croyances et de l’importance de la formation pedagogique pour le developpement de certaines croyances sont abordees en conclusion
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.008 | 0.017 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".