MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2888010845 · doi:10.34060/reesmat.v1i1.172

RAZOÁVEL DURAÇÃO DO PROCESSO: A EFETIVIDADE DO DIREITO FUNDAMENTAL À TUTELA JURISDICIONAL TEMPESTIVA E A POSSIBILIDADE FÁTICA

2017· article· pt· W2888010845 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueREVISTA ESMAT · 2017
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicBrazilian Legal Issues
Canadian institutionsCascades (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

O presente artigo tem por finalidade a realização de um estudo sobre o direito fundamental ao razoável prazo de duração do processo e a possibilidade fática da célere entrega da prestação jurisdicional. Para tanto, serão analisadas as causas que concorrem para a morosidade da Justiça, alvo de severas críticas nos últimos anos. Serão abordadas, ainda, as modificações introduzidas pela Emenda Constitucional 45/2004, a par dos reflexos que tal reforma vem surtindo na práticaforense. Foi desenvolvido com base em pesquisa bibliográfica e observação cotidiana, situando-se o tema na área de Direito Constitucional.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.715
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0050.003
Scholarly communication0.0080.002
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.370
Teacher spread0.327 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it