MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2888027426 · doi:10.33063/diva-355993

The Travels of Protean Biologies

2018· article· sv· W2888027426 on OpenAlexaffabout
Margaret Lock

Bibliographic record

Venuekritisk etnografi Swedish Journal of Anthropology · 2018
Typearticle
Languagesv
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicRace, Genetics, and Society
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHistoryCommunicationPsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We live in an era in which our anxieties are kept well stoked by the media.The effects of climate change are becoming increasingly apparent as fire and water rage out of control in numerous places and food production has dropped catastrophically.In June 2017 in the Antarctic the Larson C ice shelf cracked, creating an independent iceberg with a size equivalent to Wales, or to Prince Edward Island, Canada.This imminent major planetary event had been carefully monitored for over a decade with some trepidation, and sadly, further even more such events are in store.As of September 2016, we have been living in the Anthropocene.Designation of this new epoch was initiated in the 1980s by the ecologist Eugene Stoermer, and taken up again in 2000 by the atmospheric chemist and Nobel Laureate, Paul Crutzen at a meeting in Mexico.By 2013 over 200 peer-reviewed articles had been published about the looming, epochal transition, and Elsevier had launched a journal titled Anthropocene, followed by an e-journal Elementa: Science of the Anthropocene.The historian Dipesh Chakrabarty points out the peculiarity of this new epoch: "the Anthropocene spells the collapse of the Kantian distinction between natural history and human history".Thus we are now in the first geological epoch in which the force transforming the globe -human initiated activity -is supposedly self-conscious about what it is doing, with profound implications for politics and the allocation of responsibility (2009: 3).For a decade or more arguments have taken place as to whether the Neolithic revolution, or possibly even earlier changes brought about by humankind, evinced the beginning of the Anthropocene.The position of ecologist Erle Ellis ( 2015) and his colleagues is that the transition commenced 10,000 years ago when land clearance for agriculture and irrigation began to have a global effect on vast swaths of land.In recent centuries colonization has further reduced the biodiversity of the planet to a fraction of what it was formerly.Others argue that the industrial revolution that commenced in the late 1700s, epitomized by the steam engine, was the singular moment (Jórgensen and Jórgensen 2016).Humans have manufactured numerous mineral compounds, including more than 500 million metric tons of pure aluminium since World War 2, much of which has sedimented into earth's layers.Even more striking are "mineraloids" -glass and plastics -300 million tons of which are made annually and are present everywhere on the earth's crust and in all the oceans.Since the 1950s nine billion tons of plastic have been created.Concrete, a rock of our own making, encases much of the globe today.Human detritus is ubiquitous, principally in the form of CO2, nitrogen fertilizer, pesticides, diesel fuel, and electronic trash and mineraloids that have accumulated as toxic waste around the globe.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.193
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.013
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.301
Teacher spread0.288 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuekritisk etnografi Swedish Journal of AnthropologySame topicRace, Genetics, and SocietyFrench-language works237,207