Adaptive Channelized Greedy Algorithm for Analog Signal Compressive Sensing
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In the development of analog signal compressive sensing (CS), the degradation of reconstruction performance under noise is the main bottleneck because the CS framework is very sensitive to noise. This paper proposes an adaptive channelization-based orthogonal matching pursuit algorithm (C-OMP) combining the channelization and the adaptive iteration methods. The proposed C-OMP has two steps: channel screening and global iteration. Based on the proposed method, the original signal can be recovered adaptively in high probability of success with fewer observations under the noise background. Simultaneously, the noise can be reduced as much as possible to enhance the output signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) by excluding the noise channel during the channel screening and separating noise atoms during the global iteration. The relationship between the probability of successful reconstruction and the number of observations is mathematically analyzed. Furthermore, the parameter settings, computational complexity, and output SNR are analytically evaluated. The simulation results confirm the analytical results and further demonstrate the effectiveness and advantages of the C-OMP in the noise environment. Overall, the proposed algorithm considerably improves the performance of the analog signal CS in the practical noisy environment.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".