MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2888060566 · doi:10.1103/physrevc.98.024313

Terminating states in the positive-parity structures of <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mmultiscripts><mml:mi>As</mml:mi><mml:mprescripts/><mml:none/><mml:mn>67</mml:mn></mml:mmultiscripts></mml:math>

2018· article· lv· W2888060566 on OpenAlexafffund
R. Wadsworth, N. S. Kelsall, D. G. Jenkins, I. Ragnarsson, Susan M. Fischer, D. P. Balamuth, Paul Hausladen, G. C. Ball, M. P. Carpenter, R. V. F. Janssens, T. Lauritsen, C. J. Lister, D. Seweryniak, R. M. Clark, P. Fallon, A. O. Macchiavelli, C. E. Svensson, S. J. Freeman, D. G. Sarantites

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical review. C · 2018
Typearticle
Languagelv
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicNuclear physics research studies
Canadian institutionsTRIUMF
FundersScience and Technology Facilities CouncilNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaTRIUMFU.S. Department of EnergyOffice of ScienceNational Science Foundation
KeywordsPhysicsParity (physics)Energy (signal processing)Beam energyAtomic physicsCombinatoricsQuantum mechanicsBeam (structure)Optics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The energy levels and $\ensuremath{\gamma}$-ray decay scheme of the positive-parity states in the ${T}_{z}=\frac{1}{2}$ nucleus $^{67}\mathrm{As}$ have been studied by using the $^{40}\mathrm{Ca}(^{36}\mathrm{Ar},2\ensuremath{\alpha}p)^{67}\mathrm{As}$ reaction at a beam energy of 145 MeV. Two new band structures have been identified which can be connected to the previously known levels. The results for these bands are compared with configuration-dependent cranked Nilsson--Strutinsky calculations. The good level of agreement between theory and experiment suggests that these structures can be interpreted in terms of configurations that involve three ${\mathrm{g}}_{\frac{9}{2}}$ particles and that both possess noncollective terminating states.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.911
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.306
Teacher spread0.282 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical review. CSame topicNuclear physics research studiesFrench-language works237,207