MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2888091275 · doi:10.5539/mas.v12n9p149

Spirals and Cycles of Biological Systems via Extended Rosenzweig-MacArthur Model with Ratio-dependent Functional Response

2018· article· en· W2888091275 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Enobong E. Joshua, Ekemini T. Akpa

Bibliographic record

VenueModern Applied Science · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMathematical and Theoretical Epidemiology and Ecology Models
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersTertiary Education Trust Fund
KeywordsLimit (mathematics)Degenerate energy levelsLimit cycleConvergence (economics)Exponential functionExtinction (optical mineralogy)Dual (grammatical number)Stability (learning theory)Applied mathematicsSpiral (railway)MathematicsStatistical physicsComputer sciencePhysicsMathematical analysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper investigates stable proper nodes, stable spiral sinks and stable ω−limit cycles of Extended Rosenzweig-MacAthur Model, which incorporates ratio-dependent functional response on predation mechanism. The ultimate bound-edness condition has been used to predict extinction, co-existence, and exponential convergence scenarios of the model. The Poincare-Bendixson results guarantee existence of periodic cycles of the models. The system degenerate from stable spiral sinks to stable ω−limit cycles as control parameter varies. Numerical simulations are provided to support the va-lidity of theoretical findings.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.050
GPT teacher head0.292
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueModern Applied ScienceSame topicMathematical and Theoretical Epidemiology and Ecology ModelsFrench-language works237,207