MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2888151762 · doi:10.3389/fnins.2018.00587

BrainWave: A Matlab Toolbox for Beamformer Source Analysis of MEG Data

2018· article· en· W2888151762 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Cecilia Jobst, Paul Ferrari, Silvia L. Isabella, Douglas Cheyne

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in Neuroscience · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicFunctional Brain Connectivity Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoHospital for Sick Children
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchEpilepsy Research Program of the Ontario Brain InstituteUniversity of TorontoOntario Brain Institute
KeywordsMagnetoencephalographyComputer scienceToolboxVisualizationBrain activity and meditationFunctional magnetic resonance imagingArtificial intelligenceBrain–computer interfacePattern recognition (psychology)Normalization (sociology)MATLABSpeech recognitionComputer visionElectroencephalographyNeurosciencePsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BrainWave is an easy-to-use Matlab toolbox for the analysis of magnetoencephalography (MEG) data. It provides a graphical user interface for performing minimum-variance beamforming analysis with rapid and interactive visualization of evoked and induced brain activity. This article provides an overview of the main features of BrainWave with a step-by-step demonstration of how to proceed from raw experimental data to group source images and time series analyses. This includes data selection and pre-processing, magnetic resonance image (MRI) co-registration and normalization procedures, and the generation of volumetric (whole-brain) or cortical surface based source images, and corresponding source time series as virtual sensor (VS) waveforms and their time-frequency representations. We illustrate these steps using example data from a recently published study on response inhibition (Isabella, et al. 2015) using the Sustained Attention to Response Task (SART) paradigm in 12 healthy adult participants. In this task participants were required to press a button with their right index finger to a rapidly presented series of numerical digits and withhold their response to an infrequently presented target digit. This paradigm elicited movement-locked brain responses, as well as task-related modulation of brain rhythmic activity in different frequency bands (e.g., theta, beta and gamma), and is used to illustrate two different types of source reconstruction implemented in the BrainWave toolbox: 1) event-related beamforming of averaged brain responses and 2) beamformer analysis of modulation of rhythmic brain activity using the Synthetic Aperture Magnetometry (SAM) algorithm. We also demonstrate the ability to generate group contrast images between different response types, using the example of frontal theta activation patterns during error responses (failure to withhold on target trials). BrainWave is free academic software available for download at http://cheynelab.utoronto.ca/brainwave along with supporting software and documentation. The development of the BrainWave toolbox was supported by grants from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research, the National Research and Engineering Research Council of Canada, and the Ontario Brain Institute.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.020
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.647
Threshold uncertainty score0.988

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.020
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.004
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.076
GPT teacher head0.315
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations32
Published2018
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrontiers in NeuroscienceSame topicFunctional Brain Connectivity StudiesFrench-language works237,207