SEISMIC DESIGN OF CROSS-LAMINATED TIMBER BUILDINGS
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The increasing interest in cross-laminated timber and mass timber construction has resulted in several publications covering manufacturing, use, and code/standard regulations.This special issue of Wood and Fiber Science highlights the differences and similarities in engineering code specifics between several geographic regions, namely Canada, Europe, New Zealand/Australia, and the United States and to a very limited degree Japan.This issue focuses on critical engineering design factors such as seismic performance, connection details, and fire performance, all critical engineering design elements.To a lesser extent, this issue touches on some of the biodegradation issues that must be examined, and the economic and environmental concerns, particularly of Europe and New Zealand/Australia.When we started this project, we hoped to have a full matrix such that we had articles from every region dealing with seismic, connection, fire, economics, and environmental issues.Unfortunately busy schedules and prior commitments have limited us to this partial matrix.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it