MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2888201140 · doi:10.1109/tdc.2018.8440461

Plug-in Electric Vehicle Planning Toward DDPP Constrained by Electricity Grid Limitation

2018· article· en· W2888201140 on OpenAlexaffabout
Ali Hajebrahimi, Innocent Kamwa

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectric Vehicles and Infrastructure
Canadian institutionsHydro-QuébecUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPenetration (warfare)GridElectricityElectric vehicleMarket penetrationElectrical engineeringComputer scienceAutomotive engineeringEngineeringOperations researchPower (physics)PhysicsMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Electric vehicle (EV) has alluded as a solution for CO2emission reduction in the transportation sector. However, uncontrolled penetration of EV s considering power grid limitation will increase CO2emission in the electricity sector. Hence, in this paper, a decomposed model of EV s planning is proposed to obtain the optimal penetration of EV s considering associated uncertainties. Moreover, a new bi-level charging/discharging control which considers both desires of the PEV s and the system operator is addressed in this paper. The results demonstrate that it is possible to increase the penetration of EV s up to 30% by 2025 while reducing the total load curtailment by 37% and the total emission by 28% compared to the baseline case with no supervisory EV charging/discharging control. The proposed planning problem is applied to Ontario's grid considering existing and projected plans of transmission and generation expansion.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.025
Threshold uncertainty score0.050

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicElectric Vehicles and InfrastructureFrench-language works237,207