MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2888276831 · doi:10.1142/s0217732318501870

Exact solvability of two new 3D and 1D non-relativistic potentials within the TRA framework

2018· article· en· W2888276831 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueModern Physics Letters A · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicQuantum Mechanics and Non-Hermitian Physics
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTridiagonal matrixIntegrable systemRepresentation (politics)Series (stratigraphy)Orthogonal polynomialsWork (physics)Series expansionBasis (linear algebra)Wave function

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This work aims at introducing two new solvable 1D and 3D confined potentials and present their solutions using the Tridiagonal Representation Approach (TRA). The wave function is written as a series in terms of square integrable basis functions which are expressed in terms of Jacobi polynomials. The expansion coefficients are then written in terms of new orthogonal polynomials that were introduced recently by Alhaidari, the analytical properties of which are yet to be derived. Moreover, we have computed the numerical eigenenergies for both potentials by considering specific choices of the potential parameters.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.526
Threshold uncertainty score0.963

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueModern Physics Letters ASame topicQuantum Mechanics and Non-Hermitian PhysicsFrench-language works237,207