MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2888280460 · doi:10.15290/idea.2017.29.1.03

Martina Heideggera projekt „innej” filozofii. Krótkie studium z Przyczynków do filozofii

2017· article· pl· W2888280460 on OpenAlex
Jacek Surzyn

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIdea Studia nad strukturą i rozwojem pojęć filozoficznych · 2017
Typearticle
Languagepl
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducation and Cultural Studies
Canadian institutionsDow Chemical (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Martin Heidegger pozostaje jednym z najbardziej ciekawych i wpywowych filozofw XX wieku. Wci wzbudza emocje ujcie przez niego filozoficznej problematyki, tre i sposb wyraenia jej w jzyku (stawiano mu zarzuty mao czytelnej neologizacji niemczyzny) oraz postawa filozofa wobec nazizmu. Szokowa moe zaskakujce zaangaowanie Heideggera w latach trzydziestych, a potem, po wojnie, niezrozumiae milczenie i brak jednoznacznej krytyki reimu, szczeglnie hitlerowskich zbrodni

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Open science, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.589
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0200.004
Scholarly communication0.0050.002
Open science0.0060.003
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.060
GPT teacher head0.379
Teacher spread0.319 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it