ADMM-Based Sensor Network Localization Using Low-Rank Approximation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this paper, we present an efficient localization algorithm for sensor networks using range information. Since each sensor can only communicate with its neighbors, the Euclidean distance matrix (EDM), composed by squared distances between each pair of sensors, is incomplete. The first step of the proposed algorithm is to fulfill the EDM completion and relative maps of sensor networks are then achieved by the multidimensional scaling technique. Besides the EDM, the centralized Gram matrix of sensors’ coordinates is also used to model the localization problem. Compared with other EDM-based localization algorithms, mathematical properties of both the EDM and the Gram matrix are appropriately exploited so as to improve the estimation accuracy. The resulting localization model is formulated as a semidefinite programming problem. An alternating direction method of multipliers is further developed to enhance the scalability of the proposed algorithm. The numerical experiments demonstrate that the proposed algorithm can effectively improve the estimation accuracy of both the EDM completion and the final localization.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".