MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2888386916 · doi:10.1097/prs.0000000000004868

Theoretic and Evidence-Based Laparotomy Closure with Sutures and Meshes

2018· article· en· W2888386916 on OpenAlexaff
Lauren M. Mioton, Gregory A. Dumanian

Bibliographic record

VenuePlastic & Reconstructive Surgery · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHernia repair and management
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineLaparotomyUltimate tensile strengthWound closureIncisional herniaClosure (psychology)SurgeryHerniaWound healingHernia repairSurgical meshAbdominal wallComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The ultimate tensile strength of newly apposed tissue is the sum of the strength of the physical construct holding the tissues and the strength of biologic healing. For successful incisional hernia repair, the total strength of the repair must remain greater than the forces applied. While much work has been done to understand the science of wound healing-the ability of an open defect to contract and close-far less has been done to understand the healing of 2 newly approximated previously nonwounded surfaces held together with sutures or other implants. In this article, the elements of ultimate tensile strength on laparotomy closure as well as their progression over time will be related to clinical studies of abdominal wall closure.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.021
Threshold uncertainty score0.529

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePlastic & Reconstructive SurgerySame topicHernia repair and managementFrench-language works237,207