Bibliographic record
Abstract
A má fortuna dos clássicos em Portugal, e nomeadamente dos autores de teatro do chamado classicismo francês, visível na escassez de traduções produzidas durante as últimas décadas, leva ao regozijo de todo e qualquer amador ou especialista da época, de cada vez que alguém ousa empreender a nada fácil tarefa de verter para português textos cuja língua falada, já distante da portuguesa aquando criados, dela se encontram hoje ainda mais afastados.E ao dizer língua falada, a intencionalidade desta minha expressão leva em conta não só que todo o texto de teatro se destina, em primeiro lugar, a uma oralidade específica -a da sua proferição em cenamas também que, por razões que excedem o âmbito do que aqui me compete analisar, no tempo de Racine (visto dele se tratar) nunca um texto era publicado antes de representado e mais: a publicação só se fazia após a última representação, da série que sucedia à estreia.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.015 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.007 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.022 | 0.008 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".