MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2888437999 · doi:10.3997/2214-4609.201802217

Closed-Loop Reservoir Management Using Nonlinear Model Predictive Control: A Field Case Study

2018· article· en· W2888437999 on OpenAlex
R. M. Patel, Javier Guevara, Japan Trivedi

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicReservoir Engineering and Simulation Methods
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsModel predictive controlLinearizationNonlinear systemControl theory (sociology)Reservoir simulationNonlinear programmingOptimal controlData assimilationMathematical optimizationComputer scienceEngineeringMathematicsPetroleum engineeringControl (management)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Summary Closed-loop reservoir management (CLRM) consists of near-continuous data assimilation and real-time optimization to improve oil recovery and reservoir economics. In deep oil sands deposits using steam-assisted gravity drainage (SAGD) recovery process, CLRM involves real-time subcool (difference between actual and saturation temperature) control to develop the uniform steam chamber along the horizontal injector-producer well pair. Recently, model predictive control (MPC) has been implemented to maintain the optimal subcool; however, oversimplified models used in MPC are inadequate as reservoir dynamics in SAGD is highly complex, spatially distributed, and nonlinear. This provides an opportunity for the improved CLRM workflow which can incorporate the nonlinear physical/empirical models in MPC to represent the flow dynamics accurately over the reservoir lifecycle. In this research, two novel workflows, comprising linearization and nonlinear optimization are proposed to implement nonlinear model predictive control (NMPC) in CLRM of SAGD reservoirs. Linearization basically reduces an NMPC problem to linear MPC by estimating an equivalent linear model of a nonlinear black box model for a given input signal in a mean-square-error sense. Due to linear approximation, cost function in the MPC can be minimized using quadratic programming (QP) over the specified time horizon. Another approach is to use nonlinear dynamic models directly for accurate prediction of the plant states and/or outputs. Resulting nonconvex, nonlinear cost optimization problem is solved using interior-point algorithm at each control interval. Proposed workflows are tested using the history-matched, field-scale model of a SAGD reservoir located in northern Alberta, Canada. The horizontal well pair with dual-tubing string completion is segmented and subcool in each section is considered as an output variable while steam injection rates in both tubings and liquid production rate are the input variables of the NMPC controller. Bi-directional communication link was established between the controller and thermal reservoir simulator, acting as a virtual process plant. Qualitative and quantitative analysis of the results reveals that nonlinear black-box models can successfully capture the nonlinearity of the SAGD process in CLRM. Also, both workflows can control the subcool above desired set-point while ensuring the stable well operations. Furthermore, net-present-value (NPV) is increased by 24% when proposed NMPC workflows are used in CLRM as compared to the base case with no closed-loop control. Overall, NMPC can be successfully employed in CLRM of SAGD reservoirs for improved real-time subcool control, energy efficiency, and greenhouse gas emissions while satisfying the constraints offered by the surface facilities.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.146
Threshold uncertainty score0.895

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.310
Teacher spread0.277 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it