MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2888475826 · doi:10.7900/jot.2017nov02.2197

Hyperrigid subsets of Cuntz-Krieger algebras and the property of rigidity at zero

2018· article· en· W2888475826 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Operator Theory · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicAdvanced Operator Algebra Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMathematicsRigidity (electromagnetism)CombinatoricsGraphUnitalProperty (philosophy)Zero (linguistics)Discrete mathematicsPure mathematicsAlgebra over a fieldPhysicsQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Pure Mathematics Department, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario N2L 3G1, Canada Summary: A subset G generating a C∗-algebra A is said to be \textit{hyperrigid} if for every faithful nondegenerate ∗-representation A⊆B(H) and a sequence ϕn:B(H)→B(H) of unital completely positive maps, we have that limn→∞ϕn(g)=gfor all g∈G⟹limn→∞ϕn(a)=afor all a∈A. We show that in the Cuntz-Krieger algebra of a row-finite directed graph with no isolated vertices, the set of all edge partial-isometries is hyperrigid. We also examine, both in general and in the context of graphs, a related property named \textit{rigidity at} 0 that sheds light on the phenomenon of hyperrigidity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.373
Threshold uncertainty score0.683

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.333
Teacher spread0.295 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it