Salud Sexual: La gran olvidada del ámbito educativo
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Introduction: Sexual education is a priority in the psychosocial development of people and there is a significant deficit both in the school and the Institutes and Universities, in the informative-preventive field, as in sexual counseling and in the intervention of Clinical Sexology and / or Sexual Medicine that are taught, already as indispensable subjects in the Faculties of Medicine of Europe, USA, Canada and Latin America. In Spain we have more than a decade with a Master of Sexology that is taught at universities (Almeria, Health Sciences (UAL, Seville, Extremadura) Other University as Camilo José Cela, (at the INCISEX, the Institute of Sexological Sciences ) has been teaching sexology for more than 4 decades, and today sex education occupies spaces in many schools and in many families.The physical and emotional need to touch us, to give us pleasure and intimacy, accompanies us from birth to We die, to all people, sexuality is reworked throughout a life. \nObjective: To value sexual education in our area. \nMethod: Analysis of rights and duties in education applied to the sexual field in our country. The OMS. defines Sexual Health in 1975. The W.A.S. in the XIII World Congress of Sexology, (29.06.1997 establishes the Universal Declaration of Sexual Rights or Declaration of Valencia) and updates them in 2014. \nResults: There has been an increase in Spanish legislation in the field of sex education, however, an important deficit is still detected that logically limits the formation and development of people. For a National Sexual Health Plan, and implementation of the March 2010 Law. Organic Law 2/2010, of arch 3, on sexual and reproductive health and the voluntary interruption of pregnancy. https://www.boe.es/buscar/pdf/2010/BOE-A-2010-3514- consolidado.pdf \nConclusions: Sexual education should be increased in schools, institutes and universities that facilitate the personal development of all people, from infancy to old age. \n
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.040 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".