Le policier-éducateur et l’effectivité du droit. Exploration comparée des répertoires policiers de pédagogie du droit en France et au Canada
Bibliographic record
Abstract
À partir des années 1980 au Canada, 1990 en France, les policiers sont amenés à déployer des modules pédagogiques en établissements scolaires, sous l’effet du développement continu de programmes de prévention des risques ciblés sur le public juvénile. Cet article s’intéresse à la manière dont ce nouveau mandat policier a été intégré par les organisations policières, sur un plan pratique et symbolique. Il compare les modalités de son appropriation au plan de la sociologie policière dans les deux contextes nationaux. Il fait également le constat que ces interactions à visées éducatives contribuent à diffuser des rapports au droit et à son effectivité différents selon les deux pays. Il s’interroge sur les raisons de cet écart entre les stratégies nationales s’agissant de faire de l’ordre juridique un objet désirable.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.013 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".