MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2888636758 · doi:10.1093/nutrit/nuy040

Effect of high-carbohydrate or high‐monounsaturated fatty acid diets on blood pressure: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

2018· review· en· W2888636758 on OpenAlexafffund
Elena Jovanovski, Any de Castro Ruiz Marques, Dandan Li, Hoang V. T. Ho, Sonia Blanco Mejía, John L. Sievenpiper, Andreea Zurbau, Allison Komishon, Lea Duvnjak, Roberto Barbosa Bazotte, Vladimir Vuksan

Bibliographic record

VenueNutrition Reviews · 2018
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDiet and metabolism studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoSt. Michael's Hospital
FundersInstitute of Nutrition, Metabolism and DiabetesBanting and Best Diabetes Centre, University of TorontoEuropean Association for the Study of DiabetesNovo NordiskAstraZenecaCoordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível SuperiorCanadian Nutrition SocietyPhysicians' Services Incorporated FoundationAlberta Pulse Growers CommissionInternational Sweeteners AssociationUniversity of TorontoCanadian Cardiovascular SocietyDiabetes CanadaAlmond Board of CaliforniaInternational Nut and Dried Fruit CouncilGlycemic Index FoundationDairy Farmers of CanadaPepsiCoCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchLoblaw Companies LimitedEli Lilly and CompanyServierSociety for EndocrinologySanofiAmgen
KeywordsMedicineBlood pressureRandomized controlled trialContext (archaeology)Internal medicineMeta-analysisPopulationBiologyEnvironmental health

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Context: Current dietary guidelines for cardiovascular disease risk management recommend restricting intake of saturated fatty acids (SFAs). However, the optimal macronutrient profile, in the context of a low-SFA diet, remains controversial. The blood-pressure effect of replacing SFAs in diets with monounsaturated fatty acids (MUFAs) compared with carbohydrate has not been quantified to date. Objective: To synthesize the evidence for the effect of substituting a high-carbohydrate (high-CHO) diet for a high-monounsaturated fatty acid (high-MUFA) diet on blood pressure, a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials in a population without health restrictions was conducted. Data Sources: MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Clinical Trials were searched through June 7, 2017. Randomized controlled trials of > 3 weeks duration that assessed the effect of high-MUFA diets in isocaloric substitution for high-CHO diets on systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) were included. Data Extraction: Data were pooled using the generic-inverse variance method with random effects models and expressed as mean differences (MDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Heterogeneity was assessed by Cochran Q statistic and quantified by the I2 statistic. The quality of the evidence was assessed with the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) system. Results: Fourteen trials (n = 980 participants) were included in the analysis. Comparatively, the high-MUFA diets in isocaloric substitution for high-CHO diets did not demonstrate a greater reduction in blood pressure (SBP: MD, -0.08 mmHg [95%CI, -1.01 to 0.84], P = 0.86; DBP: MD = 0.01 mmHg [95%CI, -0.73 to 0.75], P = 0.98). The overall quality of the evidence was assessed as moderate. Conclusions: In the context of low SFAs, high-MUFA diets in isocaloric substitution for high-CHO diets did not affect blood pressure in individuals with and without hypertension. Large-scale trials achieving higher MUFA targets are required to support these findings. ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT02626325.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.040
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.042
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow), Meta-epidemiology (broad)
Consensus categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow), Meta-epidemiology (broad)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Meta-analysis · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.321
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0400.042
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.2050.028
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.090
GPT teacher head0.385
Teacher spread0.294 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designMeta-analysis
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations29
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNutrition ReviewsSame topicDiet and metabolism studiesFrench-language works237,207