MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2888644269 · doi:10.1016/j.gaceta.2018.06.004

Encuentros y desencuentros entre salud comunitaria y sistema sanitario español. Informe SESPAS 2018

2018· article· es· W2888644269 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueGaceta Sanitaria · 2018
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldHealth Professions
TopicHealth, psychology, and well-being
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPublic healthPolitical scienceSocial determinants of healthCharterHealth careCitizen journalismHealth promotionIdeologyHealth policyInternational healthPopulationPoliticsEconomic growthMedicineEnvironmental healthNursingEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A través de un recorrido histórico por la relación del Sistema Nacional de Salud español y la Salud Comunitaria, se describen las diferentes etapas de auge o declive de la Atención Primaria -y en concreto de su orientación comunitaria-, los acercamientos y distanciamientos en su relación con la Salud Pública y la influencia de las ideologías políticas dominantes. Considerando la salud comunitaria como parte esencial de la Atención Primaria, y de acuerdo con la estrategia de Alma Ata y los principios de la Carta de Ottawa, se defiende una reorientación comunitaria de los servicios de salud y se propone retomar la Atención Primaria como eje estratégico del Sistema Nacional de Salud, dada su capacidad para un abordaje integral de los procesos salud-enfermedad, sus posibilidades de reducir desigualdades y enfrentar determinantes sociales, así como de superar inequidades en salud, con la participación de la población y en coordinación con otros sectores. Los desafíos del futuro inmediato, así como las consecuencias de la crisis económica y de los recortes y debilitamiento del Estado de Bienestar, hacen evidente la necesidad de promover procesos participativos que impliquen al conjunto de actores sociales y, sobre todo, a la ciudadanía, considerada no como destinataria y’usuaria’ o consumidora, sino como sujeto activo y colaborativo. Se señala la imperiosa necesidad de incorporar procesos participativos dirigidos a crear una nueva cultura colectiva respecto a la sostenibilidad y universalidad de los recursos públicos de salud existentes. In this article, we describe the different stages of the rise and decline of Primary Health Care and, in particular, its community approach; we do so by providing a historical journey of the relationship between the Spanish National Health System and community health, outlining the connections and disconnections with Public Health as well as the influence of dominant political ideologies. We defend a community reorientation of health services, considering community health as an essential part of Primary Health Care, and in accordance with the Alma Ata strategy and the principles of the Ottawa Charter. The Primary Health System is taken up as the strategic axis of the National Health System, given its capacity for an integral approach to health-disease processes, and the possibility it poses for reducing inequalities and confronting social determinants as well as overcoming inequities in health, with the participation of the population and in coordination with other sectors. The challenges of the immediate future, as well as the consequences of the economic crisis, the cuts, and the weakening of the Welfare State, make evident the need to promote participatory processes that involve all the social actors and, above all, the citizenship -considered not as a recipient and’user’ or consumer, but as an active and collaborative subject. These participatory processes aim at creating a new collective culture regarding the sustainability and universality of existing public health resources.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.216
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0060.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0030.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0160.041

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.374
Teacher spread0.336 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it