MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2888668906 · doi:10.1063/1.5046936

DKP algebra, DKP equation, and differential forms

2018· article· en· W2888668906 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Mathematical Physics · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicAlgebraic and Geometric Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo
KeywordsMathematicsDifferential equationFormalism (music)Dirac equationClifford algebraAlgebraic differential equationDifferential formAlgebra over a fieldLagrangianMathematical physicsMultivectorPure mathematicsMathematical analysisCurrent algebraOrdinary differential equationDifferential algebraic equationJordan algebra

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

It is well known that the Clifford algebras and the Dirac equation have a representation in terms of differential forms known as the Kähler-Atiyah algebra and the Dirac-Kähler equation, respectively. In this paper, we have introduced a new product of differential p-forms and obtained a representation in terms of differential forms for the DKP algebra and for the DKP equation. We have studied the properties of this new product in some detail and obtained, among other results, the action of the rotation group in this formalism. We have also obtained a conversed current and a Lagrangian for our differential forms version of the DKP equation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.620
Threshold uncertainty score0.638

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.305
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it