MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2888690491 · doi:10.4000/books.pur.45446

L’apport de l’anthropologie clinique dans le processus de subjectivation des auteurs de violence conjugale

2016· book-chapter· fr· W2888690491 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Natacha Chetcuti‐Osorovitz

Bibliographic record

VenuePresses universitaires de Rennes eBooks · 2016
Typebook-chapter
Languagefr
FieldPsychology
TopicPsychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPsychologyHumanitiesPolitical sciencePhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

« Je parle de la responsabilité comme de la structure essentielle, première, fondamentale de la subjectivité. »Emmanuel Levinas, Éthique et infini. La prise en charge sociale et juridique des hommes auteurs de violence s’est longtemps heurtée en France à des résistances, contrairement au Canada, en particulier au Québec, où il existe depuis 1982, dans le cadre de la lutte contre les violences conjugales, des centres d’accueil institutionnalisés à destination des hommes. Ce dispositif est acco...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.803
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.005
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.053
GPT teacher head0.340
Teacher spread0.287 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePresses universitaires de Rennes eBooksSame topicPsychoanalysis and Psychopathology ResearchFrench-language works237,207