MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2888724037 · doi:10.1080/03772063.2018.1497551

TDOA and RSSD Based Hybrid Passive Source Localization with Unknown Transmit Power

2018· article· en· W2888724037 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIETE Journal of Research · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicIndoor and Outdoor Localization Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
FundersNatural Science Foundation of Shandong ProvinceNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsMultilaterationCramér–Rao boundEstimatorUpper and lower boundsComputer scienceFDOATransmitter power outputAlgorithmPower (physics)MathematicsStatisticsTelecommunicationsPhysicsTransmitter

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Passive source localization is an important issue as there are numerous applications including search and rescue and public safety. Hybrid passive source localization combining time difference of arrival (TDOA) and received signal strength difference (RSSD) is investigated in this paper. First, a TDOA and RSSD based linear weighted least-squares (WLS) estimator for passive source localization is presented. Second, the maximum likelihood (ML) estimator and Cramer-Rao lower bound (CRLB) for the hybrid localization scheme are derived as performance benchmarks. Numerical results are presented which demonstrate that the proposed hybrid localization method provides significantly better accuracy than using only the TDOA.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.769
Threshold uncertainty score0.305

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.275
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it