PRINCE: Accurate Approximation of the Copy Number of Tandem Repeats
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Variable-Number Tandem Repeats (VNTR) are genomic regions where a short sequence of DNA is repeated with no space in between repeats. While a fixed set of VNTRs is typically identified for a given species, the copy number at each VNTR varies between individuals within a species. Although VNTRs are found in both prokaryotic and eukaryotic genomes, the methodology called multi-locus VNTR analysis (MLVA) is widely used to distinguish different strains of bacteria, as well as cluster strains that might be epidemiologically related and investigate evolutionary rates. We propose PRINCE (Processing Reads to Infer the Number of Copies via Estimation), an algorithm that is able to accurately estimate the copy number of a VNTR given the sequence of a single repeat unit and a set of short reads from a whole-genome sequence (WGS) experiment. This is a challenging problem, especially in the cases when the repeat region is longer than the expected read length. Our proposed method computes a statistical approximation of the local coverage inside the repeat region. This approximation is then mapped to the copy number using a linear function whose parameters are fitted to simulated data. We test PRINCE on the genomes of three datasets of Mycobacterium tuberculosis strains and show that it is more than twice as accurate as a previous method. An implementation of PRINCE in the Python language is freely available at https://github.com/WGS-TB/PythonPRINCE.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.017 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".