MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2888837485 · doi:10.3899/jrheum.171387

Incidence of Total Hip and Knee Replacement in UK Patients with Ankylosing Spondylitis

2018· letter· en· W2888837485 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Samuel Hawley, Sarah Sacks, Paul Bowness, Daniel Prieto‐Alhambra

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Rheumatology · 2018
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSpondyloarthritis Studies and Treatments
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersInstituto de Salud Carlos IIINational Institute for Health and Care ResearchUCB PharmaUniversitat Autònoma de BarcelonaUniversity of OxfordCentro de Investigación Biomédica en Red Fragilidad y Envejecimiento SaludableServierAmgen
KeywordsMedicineAnkylosing spondylitisIncidence (geometry)Joint replacementMedical recordPopulationSpondylitisAnkylosisEpidemiologyArthroplastySurgeryPhysical therapyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ankylosing spondylitis (AS) is a chronic inflammatory disease of the axial skeleton manifested by back pain and progressive stiffness. However, it is not uncommon for peripheral joints to be involved; the underlying histopathology of which is characterized by subchondral bone inflammation that can result in joint erosion and eventual destruction. There have been emerging data on the need for joint replacement surgery among patients with AS1,2,3, although these data have mainly originated from cohorts of patients under hospital care or registry data and therefore may be more selective of severe disease. Our aim here was to better understand the need for joint replacement surgery in the overall AS population in the United Kingdom by using National Health Service (NHS) primary care electronic medical records to determine the incidence of total hip replacement (THR) and total knee replacement (TKR) following diagnosis of AS. We identified patients in the Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) with a first diagnosis of AS within the United Kingdom between January 1, 1995, and March 31, 2014. We excluded patients with a diagnosis of > 1 type of inflammatory arthritis. CPRD is a primary … Address correspondence to Dr. D. Prieto-Alhambra, Botnar Research Centre, Windmill Road, Oxford, OX3 7LD, UK. E-mail: daniel.prietoalhambra{at}ndorms.ox.ac.uk

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.030
Threshold uncertainty score0.060

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Rheumatology→Same topicSpondyloarthritis Studies and Treatments→French-language works237,207→